Language in Law: Unraveling the Impact of Translation on Criminal Trials

The role of interpreters and translators in legal settings is very important but often not given the attention it deserves. In Ireland, legal interpreting is not regulated, which means unqualified interpreters can sometimes cause problems in court cases. Karolina Jarmołowska has researched this issue in depth and found that using unqualified interpreters can actually change the course of justice. 

In this blog post, we will explore Jarmołowska’s study, which shows how important it is to have qualified interpreters in legal settings. The study is based on real cases and academic research, and it highlights the problems that can occur when interpreters are not trained properly. 

We will explain the legal frameworks that govern police and court interpreting in Ireland, and we will look at how witness statements are translated and used in court. We will also examine the details that can get lost or changed in translation. 

This study is important because it shows how language barriers can affect the outcome of court cases. It highlights the need for better regulation of legal interpreting in Ireland. This blog post will encourage people to think more about the importance of interpreters and translators in legal settings and the need to be properly trained and regulated.

Background of the Study

Karolina Jarmołowska, a researcher from Dublin City University, has been exploring a very important question: How does the accuracy of interpretation and translation in legal settings affect the outcome of a criminal trial in Ireland? Her research focuses on the lack of regulation for police and court interpreters in Ireland, who play a crucial role in conveying the statements of non-native speakers involved in legal proceedings. 

Jarmołowska’s research is focused on the pre-trial process, particularly the stage where witness statements are recorded with the help of interpreters. These statements are often pivotal to the direction of a trial and are subject to the accuracy and integrity of the translation process. Even a small error in translation can drastically alter the meaning and impact of these statements.

Jarmołowska analyzed witness statements taken at Irish Garda stations and critically examined their translation into Polish to understand the implications of this lack of oversight. She used a translation quality assessment model to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the translations. Through her research, she aims to uncover the nuances of language and interpretation that can sway the outcomes of legal proceedings.

Jarmołowska’s work highlights the pressing need for regulatory reforms in the legal interpreting and translation field in Ireland. Her research aims to initiate a conversation on the importance of qualified and skilled interpreters in upholding the integrity of the legal process. In the following sections, we will delve deeper into Jarmołowska’s findings and explore how the intricacies of language and translation influence the path of justice in Ireland.

Legal Framework and Interpretation in Ireland

Karolina Jarmołowska’s study sheds light on an important issue regarding the legal interpretation system in Ireland. The study highlights that, unlike other European countries, Ireland does not have strict regulations or certification processes for police and court interpreters. This means interpreters in these settings are not required to prove their skills or undergo formal testing. This puts the accuracy of interpretation in the hands of chance, which can have serious consequences for the justice system.

This situation becomes even more critical when we consider the European legal landscape, where strict standards and recommendations are in place to ensure the quality of legal interpretation. However, Ireland lags behind in implementing these standards, creating a gap between European norms and national practices.

The importance of accurate interpretation cannot be overstated, especially when taking an interpreted witness statement in an Irish Garda station. These statements form the foundation of a legal case, and any misinterpretation can lead to misrepresenting facts, potentially skewing the course of justice.

Jarmołowska’s study critically examines the implications of unregulated interpretation in a high-stakes environment. It highlights the need for Ireland to align its practices with the broader European framework, emphasizing the importance of qualified and skilled interpreters in upholding the fairness and integrity of the legal system.

The Study’s Approach and Analysis Models

Karolina Jarmołowska thoroughly investigated the complexities of legal interpretation and translation in Ireland and presented her findings in a detailed case study. The study highlights how difficult it can be to interpret legal language accurately.

To better understand the intricacies of legal translation, Jarmołowska used several analytical models. One of the models she used, called Juliane House’s functional-pragmatic translation quality assessment model, focuses on the function and meaning of language in legal proceedings where every word is important. The study also incorporated Christiane Nord’s functionalist model that emphasizes the purpose of the translation and the intended audience. 

Jarmołowska’s analysis of the original witness statements and their translations provides insights into the subtle ways in which language nuances can influence the interpretation of legal texts. She also used Gideon Toury’s Descriptive Translation Studies model to examine how translations conform to or deviate from the norms established in the target culture. 

Overall, Jarmołowska’s study highlights the complexities of legal translation and interpretation. It shows the importance of professional interpreters in legal settings and demonstrates the potential consequences of translation in legal proceedings.

Key Findings from the Study

Karolina Jarmołowska conducted a study that sheds light on how translation and interpretation can affect the justice system in Ireland. The study found that nuances in language can significantly impact legal outcomes.

One of the key findings was that covert translation of witness statements could disrupt the flow of a trial. Jarmołowska suggests that overt translation might be more appropriate for legal texts, as it allows for greater transparency and accuracy in conveying the original meaning of the statements.

The study also highlighted the issue of distortion in police records of interpreted witness statements. These distortions can lead to misunderstandings and misrepresentations in the legal process. 

Further, the study explored the influence of language on interpreted witness statements. The non-standard use of English and the features of spoken language in written records were identified as significant factors affecting the interpretation and perception of these statements.

Another crucial aspect of the study was the exploration of translations of interpreted records of witness statements. Jarmołowska noted instances where readability was chosen over accuracy, highlighting the role of cultural filters in translation. This can lead to lexical mismatches and ambiguities that can affect the legal interpretation and understanding of the statements.

In conclusion, Jarmołowska’s study shows that translation and interpretation practices can significantly impact the outcome of a criminal trial. The study highlights the need for regulatory reforms in this field in Ireland to ensure fair and accurate legal proceedings.

Further Reading:

• Translation of a Book of Evidence and Its Impact on a Criminal Trial – a Case Study, Karolina Jarmołowska, M.A

Follow Us on Your Favourite Social Network

• Facebook
• Instagram
• LinkedIn
• Twitter
• YouTube